Student-Privacy Pledge for Ed-Tech Providers Draws Praise, Criticism

Associate Editor

UPDATED

K-12 student-privacy pledge released Tuesday and signed by prominent ed-tech providers prompted immediate statements of concern from some advocacy groups about whether self-regulation will do the job of protecting student data.

The voluntary Pledge to Safeguard Student Privacy, co-authored by the Software and Information Industry Association or SIIA, and the Future of Privacy Forum, and signed initially by 13 companies and one non-profit, includes six “do’s” and six “don’ts” of handling student data. The signers—including Amplify, DreamBox Learning, Edmodo, Follett, Knewton, Knovation, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Microsoft, and Think Through Math—agree to abide by the provisions of the pledge effective January 1, 2015.

Among key elements of the pledge are promises to:

  • Not sell student information
  • Not behaviorally target advertising (which means targeting advertising based on a student’s web-browsing behavior)
  • Use data for authorized education purposes only
  • Not change privacy policies without notice and choice
  • Enforce strict limits on data retention
  • Support parental access to, and correction of errors in, their children’s information
  • Provide comprehensive security standards
  • Be transparent about collection and use of data

The pledge was created as parents’ worries about the privacy and security of their students’ data have resonated in state legislatures, and as the state of California enacted a strict privacy law last month. It also follows the collapse of inBloom, a controversial data management company that was striving to be a single repository for up to 400 pieces of information about each student whose data were uploaded to the cloud—but that fell under the weight of protests from parents, some educators, and others.

Software companies selling products to K-12 schools have been concerned, too, that their mission to collect and use student data to help educators better teach their students will not be permitted by law. “Without data, we are flying blind,” said Aimee Rogstad Guidera, founder and executive director of Data Quality Campaign, a national nonprofit that advocates for the effective use of education data to improve student achievement, in a statement in support of the pledge.

Range of Reactions to Pledge

The National School Boards Association and the National PTA joined the organizations that released the pledge with their endorsements in the launch announcement. Keith Krueger, CEO of the Consortium for School Networking, said he thinks the pledge is helpful. “It states, pretty clearly and crisply—in language a non-lawyer can understand—what’s not going to happen with your data,” he said. Schools and districts are looking for that kind of assurance in an industry standard about the collection, management, and use of personal information, he said.

But Leonie Haimson, executive director of Class Size Matters based in New York City and co-chair of the Parent Coalition for Student Privacy, said in a statement that “we need legally enforceable provisions requiring parental notification and consent for the disclosure and redisclosure of personal student data, as well as rigorous security standards.” She predicted that the pledge would not reassure parents about data sharing, data-mining and data breaches.

Mark Schneiderman, the senior director of education policy at SIIA, said that, when companies make public pledges like this one, it is enforceable by the Federal Trade Commission, or FTC.

Khaliah Barnes, who is the administrative law counsel at the Electronic Privacy Information Center, and director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) Student Privacy Project, said that representations made within the pledge can be enforced under Section 5 of the FTC ACT, which prohibits unfair and deceptive practices in or affecting commerce, but that such enforcement is on a “company-by-company” basis.

“The student-privacy pledge isn’t a substitute for student-privacy legislation,” said Barnes. In July, the Protecting Student Privacy Act was introduced by Sen. Edward Markey, a Democrat from Massachusetts, and Orrin Hatch, a Republican from Utah. The bill—S2690—would update the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 (or FERPA). It was read twice and referred to the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions.

The SIIA, the technology trade association, has taken the position that modernizing privacy rules need not involve new legislation.

Barnes said the pledge’s framework “has some strengths,” including the pledge not to sell student information or use it for targeted marketing, and the emphasis on data security. But she questioned how students would be allowed to access and correct data—in particular, at what points in the process of an adaptive learning software program’s algorithmic decision-making would they be permitted to gain access to their data.

Rogstad of the Data Quality Campaign said that “when education data is used as a flashlight and not a hammer,” parents can make the best education choices for their kids, teachers can tailor instruction and target interventions where needed, and education leaders can decide what resources each school needs.

Although some leading companies have signed the pledge, Barnes pointed out that the ed-tech industry is huge. “Think of SXSWedu,” she said. “There are countless others who have not signed it.” 

Other companies and organizations that have signed the pledge include: Code.org, Gaggle, Learnmetrics, Lifetouch, Maestro, myOn, MIND Research Institute, and Readorium.

See also from Education Week:

UPDATE: This post was updated to include links to a newly posted article and map from Education Week.

14 thoughts on “Student-Privacy Pledge for Ed-Tech Providers Draws Praise, Criticism

  1. Hi, I ddo believe your site may be having web browser compatibiolity issues.
    When I look at your siote iin Safari, it lookos fine however, when openinmg in IE,
    it’s got some overlapping issues. I simply wanted tto give you a quick heads up!
    Apart from that, great website!

  2. Have you ever thought about writing an e-book
    or guest authoring on other sites? I have a blog based on the same
    information you discuss and would really like to have you share some stories/information.
    I know my visitors would value your work. If you are even remotely interested, feel free to shoot me an e-mail.

  3. Es folgten jährliche Kongresse in
    London nicht zuletzt Mailand. Aus Anlass solcher dritten Tagung
    1938 in Mailand wurde von Sanvenero Rosselli
    die neue internationale Journal Plastica
    Chirurgica hrsg.. Er veranstaltete einen
    Lehrkurs bei dasjenige Weiterbildung von Plastischen Chirurgen
    in Italien. Eine sonstige Abdruck konnte
    dank des Beginns des 2. Weltkrieges alles andere als mehr
    erfolgen (Converse 1964,1977 auch weil 1967).
    Converse
    schreibt abschließend:
    » Jener internationale Kongress der ‚European
    Society of Plastic Surgery‘ war dieser
    Spitzenleistung dieser Entwicklungsverlauf
    der Plastischen
    Chirurgie vorweg DEM 2. Weltkrieg … Er erbrachte
    1936 Meilensteine jener Fortschritte
    für die Ehre jener Vorliegen dies
    neuen Zweigs der Chirurgie, alles andere als bloß in der
    Öffentlichkeit sondern selbst für Chip akademische
    Welt (Converse 1977).
    4.2.4 Besondere Beiträge
    in der Fachliteratur zwischen
    den Weltkriegen
    Besonderes Merkmal Beiträge pro den Zunahme der
    Plastischen Chirurgie sind von den im weiteren Verlauf
    genannten Autoren in jener Weile mitten unter den beiden
    Weltkriegen (1918–1939) geleistet worden.
    Verbrennungen
    Yngve Zottermann wird in puncto seines im Vorfeld
    1933 elektrophysiologisch erbrachten Nachweises
    der unterschiedlichen Leitungsgeschwindigkeit
    involvierter schmerzleitender Nerven von Seiten Voigt
    (1982) im Quote zur Fachbuch Die Verbrennungskrankheit,
    Entstehung, Vorgang noch dazu Heilverfahren
    berücksichtigt. Chip Feststellung der unterschiedlichen
    anatomisch darüber hinaus physiologisch bedingten
    Schmerzleitungsgeschwindigkeiten führte zur
    einer wissenschaftlichen neben klinisch erprobten
    Heilanzeige jener medikamentösen Schmerzbehandlung
    Brandverletzter.

  4. It iss when people can certainly geet answerrs from their questions from
    time tto time they need answers most – this is why reliabilitfy will be measured which goes a similar regarding how to find reliaable dinar information. However, this ought not
    always be the case for all of us who wish for credible updates on dinar.
    Are the words clear to support the claim no matter whatever thhe impact it may give to
    the readers.

  5. We are a bunch of volunteers and opening a new scheme in our community.
    Your site offered us with helpful information to work on. You
    have performed a formidable process and our entire community will probably
    be grateful to you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *